Presenter:
And the news exploded like a supernova last Friday. A week on, we can take stock of it and get an overview from a man who's been on the show before. A great guest, top lawyer, and Senior Associate at Knights. It's Dan Baker.
Dan, this is a right old farrago of appalling revelations. But I think it's fair to say this has got to be one of the biggest football scandals of all time now, isn't it?
Dan Baker:
Yeah, I think it's a historic verdict, regardless of whatever happens in terms of the next steps. Obviously, we've got the appeal, as you mentioned, that needs to be filed today, and then all the potential compensation claims and third-party action, whether that's from the regulator or litigation from sponsors, etc.
It is a real mess, as you say. We know that generally appeal processes heard in these Premier League disciplinary proceedings are quite limited. It won't be a complete rehearing from scratch, so it's not an opportunity to wildly reopen the case or submit new evidence. Typically, evidence is only admissible if it was genuinely unavailable until now.
So it's really interesting hearing City say that they've got irrefutable evidence proving their innocence. The appeals process is usually confidential, but a lot of the information seems to be out there already. We've had indicators, perhaps even leaks from sources before the appeal has actually been filed.
We've got an indication that the appeal is going to focus on the structure of the entities involved in the commercial deals. The Premier League process is effectively concluded after the appeal, but it won't be the end for City if the appeal is unsuccessful.
They are facing a whole world of issues, most notably compensation claims from Premier League clubs. It's already been reported that several clubs have written letters to City reserving their rights to pursue multi-million-pound compensation claims against them.
The Premier League rules specifically provide that compensation claims can follow financial rule breaches. So quite quickly, you can see that this may become very messy from a compensation perspective.
There are also significant commercial and reputational issues. It may be the end of the line for the Premier League claim itself, but sponsors and other connected parties who are implicated may decide to pursue separate action.
Presenter:
And it's highlighting that it's even tied up with diplomatic issues for the UK, isn't it?
Dan Baker:
Yeah. The UAE is a valuable trading partner. If they were to completely withdraw their investment or involvement, that could have pretty serious economic consequences.
Assuming the appeal is unsuccessful, this would be extremely damaging commercially and reputationally. Manchester City has entered into numerous sponsorship agreements, not just with Etihad but with many other organisations.
The standard form of these sponsorship agreements almost always includes good-faith clauses. These are contractual mechanisms that allow commercial partners to seek an exit from the arrangement or, in some cases, pursue more significant remedies.
Sponsors could potentially ask Manchester City to protect them financially from any reputational or commercial harm arising from this situation. While we don't know the details of the agreements, I would expect many sponsors to have rights enabling them to end their relationships if they felt it was necessary.
The Premier League also has an extremely wide range of sanctions available. The Premier League Handbook is not particularly prescriptive when it comes to sanctions, giving the panel broad discretion to make any order it sees fit. That could range from a fine to expulsion from the league, so we would expect the most severe forms of punishment to be under consideration.
